Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: quick and dirty autogen.sh patch
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: quick and dirty autogen.sh patch

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: quick and dirty autogen.sh patch
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:04:16 +0200
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > Can you explain the task of libtoolize. What does it take and what
> > files does it produce/update?
> 
> It is a while since I made this patch, and it was a rather quick hack (as
> the subject indicates). If you are serious about including it, I'll sit
> down and have a more thorough look at it.

Please do.

> > Should we take this opportunity and also remove configure? This would
> > mean that we add the autoconf and automake as dependencies for CVS
> > developers.
> 
> If you take out configure, there is no reason to stop there. Makefile,
> Makefile.in and config.h are all generated in the same process.
> 
> There is only one problem with that: We add the ancient autoconf2.13 as
> a dependency, instead of the modern autoconf2.5, so some developers are
> going to get significant problems.
> 
> So I suggest we don't do that, yet.

Question to the freeciv-dev readers: what autoconf to you use?

> I'll give porting to 2.5 a shot after the release. That will require a
> relaxation of the usual quality-of-patch rules, since it will need lots
> and lots of testing by developers to get it exactly right on all the
> various platforms.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Windows: From the people who brought you edlin...


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]