[Freeciv-Dev] Re: advdomestic.c cleanup II. (PR#1157)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:15:19PM -0500, Ross W. Wetmore wrote:
> At 06:39 PM 01/12/31 +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >Dear diary, on Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:49:49PM CET, I got a letter,
> >where "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx> told me, that...
> [...]
> >> + build_points_left(acity) > get_unit_type(unit_type)->build_cost *
> >> caravans) {
> >>
> >> *** Another line wrap.
> >Ok. Funny that people told me that I shouldn't do those changes I indent
> >will care about them ;-).
>
> Indent is not the saviour of the world, but only a useful starting point.
> Once there is a basic pattern to the code, humans are infinitely more
> capable of refining the pattern to highlight useful concepts.
>
> I keep telling Raimar that blind application of indent to every patch just
> before it goes in breaks code in many idiotic ways and removes useful added
> value of the human touch.
>
> Indent should be applied by a submitter, the code cleaned up to remove the
> worst abuse of indent and to make sure it didn't actually change something
> significant. Then changes can be applied consistent with the new (local)
> coding standard of the code to be fixed. Patchew should then be applied
> without additional (and certainly not mechanical) modification.
If I want a consistent style (K&R) in the CVS tree I have three options:
1) I fix it
2) the author fixes it (patch will be rejected because of things like
"4<5")
3) the patch goes in unchanged and a followup patch from another
person should fix it.
3) is unacceptable for me. I have the impression that 2) is not
desired by most of the people. So I use 1).
Ross wants 2) for his patches. This is ok.
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
-- Rich Cook
|
|