Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] advdomestic.c cleanup (PR#1149)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] advdomestic.c cleanup (PR#1149)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] advdomestic.c cleanup (PR#1149)
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:42:39 +0100

Dear diary, on Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:34:05AM CET, I got a letter, where
Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx> told me, that...
> --- "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is sheer speculation, but is the sort of logic that probably comes
> > into play, 16*3 == 48, 16*6 == 96, so somewhere between three and six
> > unhappies the weight becomes competitive, and over 6 is a demand level
> > weighting. 
> >
> 
> Explain this a bit more. If I understand you correctly, this is yet another
> weighting. Presumably it should be in the range (0-100) but as always
> although it never goes down below 0, it seems it can exceed 100. What does
> values of for example
> 
> 7 * 16 mean?
102 - it's greater than 100, so it's urgent now.

> I'd also like you to get a links to where you got the original info from.  I
> must be going blind, I do not remember any such comments.
i.e. /* want > 100 means BUY RIGHT NOW */ in advdomestic.c...  we summarized
this with Ross before about a week in different thread, didn't we?

-- 

                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis

UN*X programmer, UN*X administrator, hobbies = IPv6, IRC, FreeCiv hacking
.
  "A common mistake that people make, when trying to design
   something completely foolproof is to underestimate the
   ingenuity of complete fools."
     -- Douglas Adams in Mostly Harmless
.
Public PGP key, geekcode and stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/~pasky/


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]