Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: September 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Freeciv developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs
From: Greg Wooledge <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:58:56 -0400

Raimar Falke (hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:37:43PM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> > As I said I don't know how portable lex is, and yacc may simply be
> > overkill.
> Yes this may true. I don't advocate this I just want to save us some
> work. So what kind of constructs do we want/need?

Portability isn't that big a deal in this case.  As with
autoconf/automake, you don't necessarily have to require the presence
of all of the build tools on the target platform.  It's quite common to
ship the flex/bison-generated source (they generate .c files) with the
distribution tarball.  Then, the only people who need flex/bison are
the project developers (those who play with CVS), or anyone who modifies
one of the flex/bison input files.

-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

Attachment: pgpdVP9ss1CZs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]