[Freeciv-Dev] Re: win32 server
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 07:13:29PM +0000, Gaute B Strokkenes wrote:
> I don't know. You seem to regard your mini-gettext as an
> embarrassment that should be hidden in a special directory lest anyone
> catch sight of it. I don't quite agree; I think that if it works for
> the Amiga, it ought to work for Windows as well.
>
> Basically, we have the choice between maintaining a set of patches to
> the original gettext, patches that will have to be changed every time
> gettext changes. Or we can use your mini-fork, which we will have to
> update/extend every time the interfact changes. I know which one I
> think is simpler.
Do not ignore the fact that we are already distributing a gettext version
with Freeciv. It is different from Solaris gettext, for instance (and
compiling with Solaris gettext didn't work, last time I tried,
./configure --with-included-gettext was required.) So we're already
dragging our own version around - so why not patch it?
> I think it would be easier, and not very harmful, to just stick it in
> a file in common and bracket the code with #if defined (AMIGA) ||
> defined (WIN32_NATIVE) . Keep it simple, you know.
Ths is a proposal to *violate* the autoconf principle.
Which isn't necessary. You can define a 'feature' variable instead,
PATCHED_BINDTEXTDOMAIN or something like that, and make autoconf set or
clear it on those platforms that use it.
> The only function
> within that should require any changes would be bindtextdomain().
>
> --
> Big Gaute http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gs234/
> The SAME WAVE keeps coming in and COLLAPSING like a rayon MUU-MUU..
--
Reinier
|
|