Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: June 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: autosettler cleans pollution more
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: autosettler cleans pollution more

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: autosettler cleans pollution more
From: Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:30:36 -0400

At 2000/06/17 14:31 , Falk Hueffner wrote:
>Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
>> This one-liner makes auto-settlers cleanup pollution more aggressively.  It
>> should mitigate the multiple waves of global warming caused by AI players.
>> [2 pollution-cleanup-0.diff <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
>> diff -ru -X /home/jjm/cvs/no.freeciv FreecivCVS/server/settlers.c
freeciv/server/settlers.c
>> --- FreecivCVS/server/settlers.c     Wed Jun 14 10:48:37 2000
>> +++ freeciv/server/settlers.c        Sat Jun 17 09:57:23 2000
>> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@
>>    map_clear_special(x, y, S_POLLUTION);
>>    m = city_tile_value(pcity, i, j, 0, 0);
>>    map_set_special(x, y, S_POLLUTION);
>> -  return(m);
>> +  return(m * 4);  /* Pollution clean-up arbitrarily weighted more
important. */
>>  }
>>  
>>
/**************************************************************************
>
>Are you sure m is never zero, for example when evaluating Arctic or
>similar? I suggest you add one or similar, or just always return 1000
>:)

When I looked at it, m seemed to range from about 50 to about 300, but I
didn't look into what the actual full range would be.

>Also, I think the AI wouldn't cleanup pollution out of city radius,
>but perhaps that is rather uncommon, so it doesn't really matter.

Pollution only happens within a city radius.

Except for pollution caused by being nuked.  However, I don't want the AIs
to aggressively clean-up nuke pollution: a friend pointed out that making
the AIs clean up nuke pollution makes nuking them a great way of wasting
their Settlers/Engineers.  I don't want to make nukes attractive to use, so
I'm thinking of adding a different kind of pollution, S_FALLOUT, that acts
just like S_POLLUTION in game terms, but that the AI doesn't aggressively
clean-up.

jjm




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]