Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: May 2002:
[freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed

[freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed
From: Miguel Farah <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:26:38 -0400
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

 Cameron Morland [01/05/2002 11:24] dijo/said:
>La 2002-05-01, Miguel Farah skribis:
>> I've been away for some time - as a matter of fact, ever since natural
>> names were being first discussed. I am ready now to take care of the
>> rulesets I made, and am a bit confused over the intention of the
>> feature: I seem to remember that natural names were supposed to be used
>> for city names that clearly identified some terrain condition. For
>> example, a city called "Montefr=EDo" ("cold hill") should be marked as a
>> hill city because of its name, whereas "Barcelona" couldn't be marked as
>> a coastal one because its name doesn't say "coast" anywhere, even if the
>> city actually is. Am i right?
>That was my intention with the patch. If others don't agree, they are free =
>to implement things differently.

Great, I'll implement it your way.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]