Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: May 2002:
[freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed

[freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed
From: Cameron Morland <cjmorlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:29:50 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

La 2002-05-01, Miguel Farah skribis:

> I've been away for some time - as a matter of fact, ever since natural
> names were being first discussed. I am ready now to take care of the
> rulesets I made, and am a bit confused over the intention of the
> feature: I seem to remember that natural names were supposed to be used
> for city names that clearly identified some terrain condition. For
> example, a city called "Montefr=EDo" ("cold hill") should be marked as a
> hill city because of its name, whereas "Barcelona" couldn't be marked as
> a coastal one because its name doesn't say "coast" anywhere, even if the
> city actually is. Am i right?

That was my intention with the patch. If others don't agree, they are free =
to implement things differently.

| cjmorland@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| Never let your schooling interfere with your education.
|     --Mark Twain

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]