[freeciv-data] Re: natural city names changed

[Cameron Morland <cjmorlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

La 2002-05-01, Miguel Farah skribis:

> I've been away for some time - as a matter of fact, ever since natural
> names were being first discussed. I am ready now to take care of the
> rulesets I made, and am a bit confused over the intention of the
> feature: I seem to remember that natural names were supposed to be used
> for city names that clearly identified some terrain condition. For
> example, a city called "Montefr=EDo" ("cold hill") should be marked as a
> hill city because of its name, whereas "Barcelona" couldn't be marked as
> a coastal one because its name doesn't say "coast" anywhere, even if the
> city actually is. Am i right?

That was my intention with the patch. If others don't agree, they are free =
to implement things differently.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------
| PGP http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/student/cjmorlan/public-key.pgp
| cjmorland@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Never let your schooling interfere with your education.
|     --Mark Twain
+-----------------------------------------------------------------