[aclug-L] Re: SuSE vs. Mandrake
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
I always had problems with getting Mandrake installed when I first
started using linux and so I switched to RedHat when 5.2 came out.
Aparently Mandrake didn't like the hardware that I had in the computer
and RedHat didn't have a problem with my hardware. I could also find
more books to read about RedHat linux. I recently switched to SuSE when
I had problems getting RedHat updates on multiple machines. SuSE
doesn't give me any hassles with updates and I like the way that SuSE
looks and works. I just wish that I knew how to get my seti script in
runlevel 3 on SuSE. Jeff Vian knows how to get the script to work on
RedHat, but not on SuSE. Because of the RedHat update problems, I am in
the process of switching all of my linux boxes to SuSE. I just upgraded
one of the computers today and in the process of the upgrade, I removed
RedHat and installed SuSE. Since I am not doing any windoze tech
support any longer, then I am thinking about removing XP and installing
SuSE on that box also. That would make 8 linux boxes and one Win2k box
in my office.
I have a friend who likes Mandrake and she is always trying to get me to
switch to Mandrake so that I can help her learn all the ins and outs of
linux. I wish that I knew all the ins and outs also. I'm working on
it. ~Anne
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 23:12, Dustin Keib wrote:
> Anne
>
> At the meeting last night, we were discussing SuSE and Mandrake, and you said
> that you preferred SuSE over Mandrake. Can you give me a few of the reasons
> you have for this? I know it is RPM based, but does it have anything similar
> to urpmi or apt-get for installing software directly off the internet?
> (Ports packages like BSD or any non-distro-included software) Can you
> compare the layout of the GUI (I assume KDE is the default desktop) and
> usablity factors? Is there anything broken in the default install (like
> Mandrake and RedHat seem to always be) <- go ahead guys, flame away...
> Anything else you think I should know before I trash my beloved Mandrake 9.1
> install?
>
> Thanks
> Dustin
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, jlweaver, 2003/09/10
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, Jonathan Hall, 2003/09/10
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, Jeremy Johnstone, 2003/09/10
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, Jeff Vian, 2003/09/10
- [aclug-L] Re: is this not the most mac looking non-mac machine you've ever seen?, Jeremy Johnstone, 2003/09/10
[aclug-L] Re: SuSE vs. Mandrake, Jeremy Johnstone, 2003/09/09
[aclug-L] Re: SuSE vs. Mandrake,
Anne McCadden <=
|
|