[aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> A fair comparision is if I was running Win2k server, with IIS and SQL
> running, then the speed that the apps launch would be about the same as
> linux, but linux is much more stable than win2k server. (Apples to
> apples) If I compare Win-xp pro with linux, then Win-xp pro is faster,
> xp pro isn't running any server or any other apps in the background.
> (Apples to oranges) ~Anne
for desktop, i think a more fair comparison would be winxp vs linux w/o
any unnecissary services running.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux in other languages, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Jonathan Hall, 2002/11/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, John Goerzen, 2002/11/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Jonathan Hall, 2002/11/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, John Goerzen, 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, flimzy, 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Luke Wahlmeier, 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Anne McCadden, 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table,
Jesse Kaufman <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Jonathan Hall, 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Anne McCadden, 2002/11/27
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/11/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux Time-Table, Jonathan Hall, 2002/11/26
|
|