[aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:24:59PM -0500, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman) wrote:
>
> On 18 Sep 2001 16:49:08 -0500, Steven Saner wrote:
> >
> > You are likely to receive a SYN packet (basically just a mostly empty
> > TCP packet that is asking to make a connection) for any real IP
> > address that is on your network. If there is no machine with that IP
> > address, then there will of course be no response, other than maybe an
> > ICMP host unreachable from your router. If there is a machine with
> > that IP address, but there is nothing listening to port 80, there will
> > be a response basically saying that the port is not open. If you have
> > private addresses behind the NAT box, there won't be a connection
> > attempt to those directly.
>
> ok, so i'm understanding it ok, then... i used to have both boxes get a
> routable/"real" ip address via dhcp on my cablemodem, but now it's setup
> so my router/firewall gets the real ip and my wkstation uses 192.168.0.2
> so that no connections (sans a few i've opened w/ port redirection for
> ftp and napster-like progs) can be made to it from outside...
>
> let's say 11.12.13.14 tries to make a connection to me, but i've setup
> my firewall to deny tcp and udp from 11.12.13.14 on any port... will my
> machine send back a packet that says "connection refused", "host
> unreachable", or just drop the packet and ignore it like it didn't
> exist?
That depends on how you have your firewall configured. You can do either.
> i know these are pretty basic questions, but i've never really dove into
> stuff this deep before, and we're still on the OSI physical layer which
> is a bit below this, iirc... can't recall for sure, but would this be
> in the network layer of the OSI model?
>
> also, other than the online cisco cirriculum, do you know of any good
> online reading that discusses this in an fairly easy-to-understand way?
> i'm sure O'Reily has atleast one book about this stuff, but after all my
> novell books, i'm flat broke! : ^ )
Are you looking for general TCP/IP documentation, or Cisco specific
documentation?
Steve
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Joshua S Brown, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Steven Saner, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Maverick, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Microsoft Worm/Virus (was Re: Hacker or ??), james l, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Steven Saner, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Steven Saner, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??,
Steven Saner <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix, 2001/09/19
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Joshua S Brown, 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2001/09/18
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Jeff Vian, 2001/09/19
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Maverick, 2001/09/20
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, gLaNDix, 2001/09/20
- [aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Jeff Vian, 2001/09/20
[aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??, Maverick, 2001/09/19
|
|