[aclug-L] Re: Hacker or ??

["gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman)" <glandix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18 Sep 2001 16:49:08 -0500, Steven Saner wrote:
> If you have
> private addresses behind the NAT box, there won't be a connection
> attempt to those directly.

oh, and i guess what i should have said is that in a worse-case scenario
(or best-case, depending how you look at it) the amount of traffic due
to stuff like code red and this new stuff would be cut in half...  in
all actuality, i really don't know if it would hit 2 machines on the
same network equally...  for all i know, it never hit one machine...
the ip's it picks (after the initial number or so) seem to be fairly
random...

i just wish someone would atleast add a database of attempted ip's so
that once it tries you and infects you, can't infect you, or doesn't
find port 80 open, your ip would be added and not tried again...  but
then again, that kinda defeats some of the annoying-ness which i'm sure
the "author" loves to see... : ^ )

gLaNDix

-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi