Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: July 2000:
[aclug-L] Re: What technically is called linux?
Home

[aclug-L] Re: What technically is called linux?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: What technically is called linux?
From: John Alexander <john.alexander@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:33:52 -0500
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

So, how long before the 6. version?

ja

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Nate Bargmann
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 11:54 PM
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: What technically is called linux?


On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 11:53:44PM -0500, Jonathan Hall wrote:
> Beer-on-Demand isn't until kernel 3.2, tho... :-)

At the current rate of kernel development, that means I have to hoof
it to the corner store until at least 2008...but then at the current
rate of Debian development, Debian 3.2 will get here around 2020, by
which time I'll be thirsty, tired, and 56.  I better go to bed.

- Nate >>

--
 Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB          | "None can love freedom
 Internet | n0nb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               | heartily, but good
 Location | Wichita, Kansas USA EM17hs          | men; the rest love not
   Wichita area exams; ham radio; Linux info @  | freedom, but license."
             http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/           | -- John Milton

-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi



-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]