[aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Carl D Cravens <raven@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 10 Feb 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > The downsides are that tape drives are slow compared to hard drives,
>
> Kind of sad that backup solutions have become more expensive than on-line
> storage (hard drives). It'd be cheaper to throw a second drive into the
> box and backup to it. (Not mirror... most of the time I restore a file,
That's why I asked what he wanted to do with it. If you just want one
copy, this is a good idea. If you want archival copies and off-site
backups, tapes are a lot cheaper because the media is so much
cheaper. The up-front cost is larger, but you quickly make up for it.
-- John
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] ATX Power Fan, (continued)
- [aclug-L] ATX Power Fan, David Carmichael, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Bob_Deep, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Dale W Hodge, 2000/02/10
[aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Carl D Cravens, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation,
John Goerzen <=
|
|