[aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On 10 Feb 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> The downsides are that tape drives are slow compared to hard drives,
Kind of sad that backup solutions have become more expensive than on-line
storage (hard drives). It'd be cheaper to throw a second drive into the
box and backup to it. (Not mirror... most of the time I restore a file,
it's becasue I deleted something I didn't want to, and mirroring wouldn't
help that.) My only problem with that approach is that anything external
(power surge, failed controller, whatever) could kill both drives.
Right now I backup to CD... but the CD-R is in my Windoze box (can't give
up some Windoze apps, so I run an X emulator on it) and right now FTP my
tar files over. I'm up to three CD's for a full backup and would like to
back up one section on a daily basis. But a tape drive is just too
expensive, even after the long-term costs of CD-R.
--
Carl D Cravens (raven@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Squirt guns don't squirt people, kids do.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] SCSI tape drive recommendation, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] ATX Power Fan, David Carmichael, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Bob_Deep, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, John Goerzen, 2000/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation, Dale W Hodge, 2000/02/10
[aclug-L] Re: SCSI tape drive recommendation,
Carl D Cravens <=
|
|