[linux-help] Re: hub setup
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Jim Vetor wrote:
>
> These explainations to hook two computers together lack the main thing,
> information on what is needed and how to go about getting the job done. Not
> everyone knows how to do any of it. I would think your replies would be to
> help anyone who is interested in the topic being talked about and explain it
> from start to finish. Thanks to all who try and help, I enjoy reading what
> you have to say. Some times it is like some forget some of us are real new.
> Jim
You mentioned "cable"; does this mean the TV cable service?
If that is the case, there is a simple, but potentially more
expensive way and a more complicated (and potentially slower
in terms of bandwidth) way.
1.) just obtain from your computer store of choice an ethernet
hub (if you don't already have it) and two Cat 5 <PATCH> cables.
Depending on how your hub is designed, you'll either need a
third one or a <CROSSOVER> cable (looks identical unless you
look REALLY close; wired different) When you go to buy your
cables take the hub along and they can tell you by looking at
it which one you need. Then you just plug them in the approp-
riate holes in the hub and configure your browser accordingly.
The reason this is (potentially) more expensive is that the
cable companies are threatening to charge by the network add-
ress, and set up this way you would have two addresses, one per
machine. Here in K.C. they haven't started doing it YET, but
they've sent letters about the possibility.
2.)The more complicated way (as Steve Saner discusses in his
reply) is to set up IPMasquerading by using one of the machines
as a firewall/router; there is a LOT MORE to this way of doing
things, and it precludes using one of the machines for much of
anything but the router (I believe.) An alternative is a purpose-
built router (also available from your reseller) but that's an
additional expense ($150 or so) although it is perhaps the easiest
to set up.
The reason this is (potentially) slower is you divide the bandwidth
of your (single) connection between your two computers; people who
have discussed this on this and other discussion lists say you never
notice this, so perhaps it's not a consideration.
So, two possibilities; I read Mr. Saner's reply to your original
message, and he makes a valid point or two. These lists are for
voluntary discussion (I wondered about changing the name to [Linux-
Help] when they did it) and those who answer messages tend to make
some assumptions. They think the people who ask questions are at
a fair level of accomplishment before undertaking the complexities
of Linux, and therefore they answer only the hard parts of a question
leaving the easy stuff "as an exercise for the reader." For example,
I just read Phrostie's second response, and he reminded me that I
still don't know for sure that you have ethernet cards in either
machine; they don't necessarily come with them.
Which brings us to another point about your original message: details
are very necessary if a person is to attempt to help long-distance
like this. There have been BOOKS written about the nuts and bolts
of setting up networking, even at this very basic level; the "how-
to's" that the other posters mentioned are quite lengthy, as well.
To get a consise answer (read "easy") requires a lot of detail in
the question.
Hope this helps...
"This guy would argue with a signpost!"
-- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
|
|