Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv: August 2005:
[Freeciv] Re: siege
Home

[Freeciv] Re: siege

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: sds@xxxxxxx, freeciv@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv] Re: siege
From: Peter Schaefer <peter.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:01:33 +0200

Well, maybe for a start, to increase the chance that something like
this gets implemented, one should not be able to work tiles that are
not within your borders.

da mirror

On 8/7/05, Sam Steingold <sds@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Placing an enemy city under siege should be easier:
> a city should not be able to work a square that is reachable by an enemy
> unit in 1 turn.
> this means that entering the area around the city so as to be able to
> displace another player's city work should require a declaration of war.
> alternatively, displacing worked squares requires declaration of war.
> (squares covered by friendly units can be worked)
>=20
> --
> Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
> <http://truepeace.org> <http://www.honestreporting.com> <http://pmw.org.i=
l/>
> <http://www.savegushkatif.org> <http://ffii.org/>
> Is there another word for synonym?
>=20
>=20
>=20
>



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]