[Freeciv] Re: autodiplomats
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 01:37:49 +0200
Thomas Strub <ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> my idea: (not perfect now ...)
>
> A D M C R D
> -----------
> A | H C U U N N
> D | H C U U U N
> M | H H C C U N
> C | H H C C U N
> R | H H H C U N
> D | H H H C U N
Maybe not perfect but imho it's a very good idea to reduce the cases in
which a city can be bribed and the governement/happiness criteria seems
to be the more judicious.
>
> another idea then is that when you aren't successful with bribing your
> money is lost.
Yes, this is increasing risk in a bribing attempt. This may be rather
dissuasive with the new costs.
The "limited moves" (PR#4593) possibility could be also an idea by
giving a real utility to defending dips.
G. Gracian
[Freeciv] Re: autodiplomats, ggracian, 2003/08/04
|
|