[Freeciv] Re: globalwarming
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> Another if-you-don't-like-it-code-it-yourself response. Is this
> really necessary? Its assumed by everyone that if a person talks
> about an idea in a newsgroup without mentioning code specifics, its
> very likely he/she can't code it, or they wouldn't have even brought
> the issue up in the first place, they just would go out and do it.
I was just trying to make the point that it's been considered long ago,
and nobody did it before, therefore it isn't likely to be picked up
by somebody else. I don't know how you see an implied insult but I
will refrain from answering if it makes you or anybody else happy.
BTW my point was invalidated by the other reply, which stated that
the AI behaves better in 1.11.4.
> All you needed to say was "its very hard to implement, and no one has
> taken up that challenge yet".
It's not necessarily hard to implement, but the AI code is hard to read.
> Besides, it's in the AI's interest to clear pollution on it's land
> just as much as a human player. The AI will be hurt by global
> warming, and it's nearby city, crippled by the nuke, will need the
> full production from unpolluted land to rebuild. It has nothing to do
> with "table manners".
This is a matter of dispute. I think global warming can be used as a
'scorched earth' tactic.
--
Reinier
[Freeciv] Re: globalwarming, Reinier Post, 2000/08/06
|
|