Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: July 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9328) improvements to set_ratio
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9328) improvements to set_ratio

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9328) improvements to set_ratio
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:28 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9328 >

Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Christian Knoke wrote:
> 
> 
>><URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9328 >
>>
>>On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:39:01AM -0700, Jason Short wrote:
>>
>>><URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9328 >
>>>
>>>There are two problems with set_ratio:
>>>
>>>- It enforces even sizes (xsize/ysize).  This is unnecessary for current
>>>topologies, and it's easy to avoid it by adding a new internal variable
>>>"factor".
>>
>>Can you call it "sizeratio" or "sizefactor"?
>>
>>"factor" can mean everything.
> 
> I like ratio.

Except it's not a ratio.  Xratio and Yratio are two separate values that 
do the ratio.  This is just a multiplication factor that could be used 
to create even dimensions.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]