[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8537) ? Kingdom ?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8537 >
>> Have you ever noticed that in civclient there is a menu which is
>> called "Kingdom"?
>> :)
>>
>> Strange..
>>
>> No doubt it should be called differently.
>> My propositions are: "Empire" or "State"
Empire implies an expansionist civilization bent on conquest and/or
colonization. While I imagine this is true for most Freeciv games a
more general term would be better.
State is good, but maybe a little vague? It's definately the most
accurate term IMO.
> What's wrong with kingdom?
Kingdom implies having a king, i.e. a monarchy or similar. We need a
government non-specific term.
> Or rather, why is kingdom any worse than empire, state, realm,
> nation, civilization, etc.?
> Nation may be marginally better because that's the term used
> elsewhere (nations.ruleset, etc.), but they all mean pretty much the
> same thing.
I like nation. My vote is for either Nation (consistency) or State
(accuracy).
-Morgan
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8537) ? Kingdom ?,
Morgan Jones <=
|
|