[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4725) Rename map_get_known and map_get_known_and_s
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
To: |
undisclosed-recipients: ; |
|
Subject: |
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4725) Rename map_get_known and map_get_known_and_seen to map_is_* |
|
From: |
"Andy Smith" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Aug 2003 04:09:18 -0700 |
|
Reply-to: |
rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:35:52AM -0700, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> > Good points.
> >
> > Yet the current naming system is still broken. We have map_is_known and
> > map_get_known2. "known" means two different things in these function
> > names. We need to decide on a consistent meaning and come up with a new
> > term to describe the other. Perhaps map_is_known and map_get_known_type?
>
> Well, map_is_known and map_get_known would be better than before.
> Is map_is_known and map_get_known_type even better? I am not sure, but I
> would be willing to commit any of the above naming schemes.
OK, I will provide a patch for map_get_known2() -> map_get_known_type().
|
|
