[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things.
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Raimar Falke wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:05:16AM +0100, Juan Uriarte wrote:
I didn't looked at the patch. Now looking in the current patch I see
that we both had indead the same idea. I avoided zlib compression till
now since I thing it can be done on top of the deltas
transparently.
This is what is implemented. All 6 features (zlib and 5 new packet types)
are optional and indepent, backward compatibility is a goal.
If we implement delta we should implement it in all packets. So
backward compatibility isn't a goal for my patch.
Why shouldn't backward compatability be a goal? Shouldn't it be a
simple matter to check capabilities before taking the delta of the packet?
jason
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Jason Dorje Short, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Raimar Falke, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Jason Dorje Short, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Thomas Strub, 2002/11/06
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Christian Knoke, 2002/11/06
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Network bandwidth, and other things., Jason Dorje Short, 2002/11/06
|
|