[Freeciv-Dev] Re: CMA failed assertion caused by Freight (PR#1684)

["Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I don't understand why you cannot leave it at sending the new
> > informationto the client. The use of auto arrange workers here
> > should be unnecessary for the CMA.
>
> The citymap state and the city status has to be
> consistent. server_set_tile_city doesn't update the city
> status. auto_arrange_workers is just a bonus here.

I would say the opposite of a bonus. It is bad and dangerous.

> > As I said earlier, auto arrange worker code should not be called this deep
> > in the code. That also applies to current case C_TILE_WORKER. Instead, I
> > suggest displaced workers are turned into elvises, and that a new city
> > bitvector is used to tellif a tile has been previously displaced, so that
> > if the tile becomes available again, we remove the last specialist and put
> > a worker in the tile instead.
>
> Sounds complicated if the server uses CM.

Why?

Yours
Per

"I don't see why people are so upset about cloning sheep. American
television networks have been doing that to their audiences for years."
-- Jello Biafra