Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: June 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: SDL port / disaster
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: SDL port / disaster

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Daniel Bennett <ddbennet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Sjölie <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx>, <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: SDL port / disaster
From: Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa <vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 23:27:07 +0100 (WET DST)

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Daniel Bennett wrote:

> >
> > Nice! :)
> > I'd like to see the code... :) Is that possible or do you want to take
> > it a bit further yourself? Do you have any possibility of setting up an
> > cvs server?
> >
>       I'd be happy to set up a CVS repository however I have a couple of
> requirements before I'll be able to do so.
>
>       First, I need to find a way to separate my code from the gui-xaw
> directory I'm camping out in.  Presently I'm merely modifying the Makefile

Well, the Xaw client has been poorly maintained for quite a while (more
than a year i believe). It will require some additional effort if you want
to add the  other features that are contained in the GTK+ client in the
future. I believe the Amiga (MUI) and Win32 clients were based from the
GTK+ client.
I can understand why that was your first choice since i guess you are
probably much more familiarized with the Xaw client.

> as I go.  I'm not comfortable with automake and autoconf so creating a
> clean patch against FreeCiv is going to take me a while.  Before I start

Making the auto* patch is pretty easy. If you desire, there are people
here who can do that for you. And BTW, by developer consensus some time
ago we decided the name is Freeciv not FreeCiv. It is even easier to
type. :-)

> sharing this I want to be able to keep up with the latest FreeCiv common
> easily.
>
>       Second, well, there is no second I guess..


---
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]