Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: May 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9
From: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:05:10 +0200

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:20:19PM +0100, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > 
> > Is it true:
> >  - if we remove the is_position_safe and let the trireme issue out
> >  that the best path is independent of the choose policy (TC_MINIMUM,
> >  TC_AVERAGE, TC_MAXIMUM)?

I forgot to add that turn_cost_factor and move_cost_factor should be 0.

> no: you have 6 moves/turn, choose between these 3-segment paths:
> (a) 5-6-5
> (b) 6-6-2
> (c) 5-2-6
> 
> MINIMUM will go for (a)
> MAXIMUM will go for (b)
> AVERAGE will go for (c)

I think with the above addition (c) is always choosen.

> >  - if we implement is_position_safe that the best path depends on the
> >  policy and so TC_NONE has to be removed?

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Using only the operating-system that came with your computer is just
  like only playing the demo-disc that came with your CD-player."


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]