[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:
>
> Is it true:
> - if we remove the is_position_safe and let the trireme issue out
> that the best path is independent of the choose policy (TC_MINIMUM,
> TC_AVERAGE, TC_MAXIMUM)?
no: you have 6 moves/turn, choose between these 3-segment paths:
(a) 5-6-5
(b) 6-6-2
(c) 5-2-6
MINIMUM will go for (a)
MAXIMUM will go for (b)
AVERAGE will go for (c)
> - if we implement is_position_safe that the best path depends on the
> policy and so TC_NONE has to be removed?
>
> Raimar
>
>
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/24
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/05/24
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9,
Gregory Berkolaiko <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/31
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Raimar Falke, 2002/05/31
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/05/31
|
|