Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: May 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] Path finding interface #9
From: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:20:19 +0100 (BST)

On Tue, 28 May 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:
> 
> Is it true:
>  - if we remove the is_position_safe and let the trireme issue out
>  that the best path is independent of the choose policy (TC_MINIMUM,
>  TC_AVERAGE, TC_MAXIMUM)?

no: you have 6 moves/turn, choose between these 3-segment paths:
(a) 5-6-5
(b) 6-6-2
(c) 5-2-6

MINIMUM will go for (a)
MAXIMUM will go for (b)
AVERAGE will go for (c)

>  - if we implement is_position_safe that the best path depends on the
>  policy and so TC_NONE has to be removed?
> 
>       Raimar
> 
> 



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]