[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC] [Patch] Unused parameter
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> if choice is A_NONE this advisor doesn't want any tech researched at
> the moment
> ***********************************************************************/
> -void military_advisor_choose_tech(struct player *pplayer,
> +void military_advisor_choose_tech( /*@unused@ */ struct player *pplayer,
> struct ai_choice *choice)
> {
> choice->choice = A_N
--- Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The attached patch tags unused parameter with "/*@unused@*/" which
> splint understands. This patch could act as a discussion base and to
> decide case by case what should happen with the parameter: remove it
> or keep it. For example the parameters in create_improvements_list,
> handle_move_unit and notify_about_incoming_packet should be
> removed. create_help_page should be removed altogether. In some other
> cases (get_total_attack_power, build_*_time) it indicates some
> flexibility which was never used. Should this flexibility be kept?
>
> Raimar
>
> --
> email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -void attitude_advisor_choose_tech(struct player *pplayer,
> +void attitude_advisor_choose_tech( /*@unused@ */ struct player *pplayer,
> struct ai_choice *choice)
I vote for getting rid of all the pplayer structs. There's no advantage to
keeping it in the AI code.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
|
|