| [Freeciv-Dev] Re: call for a fix for 903 and 1113 (horse in ocean)[Top] [All Lists][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 
| To: | Freeciv-Dev <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | [Freeciv-Dev] Re: call for a fix for 903 and 1113 (horse in ocean) |  
| From: | Thue <thue@xxxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:33:56 +0100 |  
 On Sunday 30 December 2001 22:11, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 09:24:48PM +0100, Thue wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 December 2001 21:18, Thue wrote:
> > > On Saturday 29 December 2001 23:38, Thue wrote:
> > > > Same patch with 2 functions renamed and a comment added.
> > > >
> > > > -Thue
> > >
> > > Mike Kaufman points out a bug that shows up a misunderstanding in
> > > my patch. Hopefully this new patch is more correct.
> > > This also fixes the transfer to ally problem I mentioned in the
> > > first patch.
> > >
> > > We still need to set the transported_by field correctly, but that
> > > is not a big problem.
> > >
> > > -Thue
>
> whoa, your latest patch now just wastes the units instead of
> transferring them? Are you missing part of the patch? I'm confused...
>
> -mike
>
> > Umm, wait, that's wrong too. I think we do need the transported_by
> > field.
> >
> > -Thue
As I said, disregard that last patch. I will try to cook up a real 
solution later by fixing transported_by first.
-Thue
 
 
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: call for a fix for 903 and 1113 (horse in  ocean), mateusz stefek, 2001/12/29[Freeciv-Dev] Re: call for a fix for 903 and 1113 (horse in ocean), (continued)
 
 |  |