Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH change_specialist
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH change_specialist

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH change_specialist
From: Gregor Zeitlinger <zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:04:29 +0100 (CET)
Reply-to: gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Raimar Falke wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:13:48PM +0100, Gregor Zeitlinger wrote:
> > > Whats wrong with TRUE and FALSE?
> > I just thought, if some parts of the code will be taken to Java, it makes
> > it easier, since Java has no preprocessor.
> Can sed be used for this?
probably, but thats not a desirable way as it adds an extra unnecessary
step and reduces readablity.

> > > > +typedef int boolean;
> > > A "can" or "is" in the function name is enough to indicate a boolean
> > > return type.
> > it's more clear that way. It follows the approach to make code more
> > readable. Thus, boolean indicates that only true and false are allowed and
> > any assignment statement to a boolean variable should be that way.
> 
> However in C the compiler doesn't check it. So it IMHO equivalent to
> write "return boolean" in a comment.
??? The C compiler treats it as an int, AFAIK.

-- 
Gregor Zeitlinger      
gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]