Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: C vs C++ vs Java
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: C vs C++ vs Java

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: C vs C++ vs Java
From: Andrew Sutton <ansutton@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 01:08:24 -0500

On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:22 am, Ross W. Wetmore wrote:
> At 04:40 PM 01/12/03 +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> There are at least two aspects you might be missing, Andy.
>
> The first is that when the same code runs on both the client and the server
> you don't need to ship the object code, just the non-transient data fields.
> But the equivalent object down to byte order is run on either end so there
> are no behavioural surprises. You get the equivalent effect to shipping
> full objects. Java RMI, which is basically RPC but trying to act like COM
> or CORBA, works this way giving you the chance to build a distributed App
> that you can think of as running in a single environment. Also, there is
> only one build, and one shipping product to be distributed everywhere.
> (Aside: Losing sight of the network, tends to produce poorly performing
> Apps with some key design features missing, so don't do this naively :-).

yeah... that was just a tangent. i really don't expect to write something 
that flexible because it really isn't that necessary. it was just an 
interesting idea.

andy


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]