[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Say Yes to C++ style comments
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On 2001-11-30 02:36:28, Raahul Kumar wrote:
>
> --- Jules Bean <jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > <pedant comment="sorry">
> >
> > Yes it is. The current C standard is "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E), as
> > amended by ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor.1:2001 (E)", commonly known as 'C99'.
> >
> > C99 includes // comments.
> >
> > Sadly (nay, ridiculously!) the standards group don't *seem* to put the
> > standard online. However, the GCC features table makes it clear
> > enough what's in it..
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
> >
> > </pedant>
>
> I'd like a vote from the current developers and maintainers. Make using //
> comments legal.
Does anyone have an example where freeciv is compiled with a compiler
that cannot handle "//"??
If not I think we should allow it... Even if it might pose a problem for
someone somewhere sometime in the future...
/Daniel
--
Now take a deep breath, smile and don't take life so seriously... :)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v4, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v3, Raimar Falke, 2001/11/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Why not C++ style comments?, Raahul Kumar, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Why not C++ style comments?, Raimar Falke, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] C/C++ Compilers used with Freeciv, Raahul Kumar, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Why not C++ style comments?, Reinier Post, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Why not C++ style comments?, Reinier Post, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Why not C++ style comments?, Jules Bean, 2001/11/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Say Yes to C++ style comments, Raahul Kumar, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Say Yes to C++ style comments,
Daniel Sjölie <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Say Yes to C++ style comments, Reinier Post, 2001/11/30
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2001/11/28
|
|