[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Arien Malec wrote:
>
> --- Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Can you show some examples of simple_set_statement and
> > object_set_statement. IMHO should these two be unified. So
> >
> > set players Caesar ailevel hard; OR
> > set players.Caesar.ailevel=hard;
> >
> > should be use the same syntax as a
> >
> > set unit archer vison 2; OR
> > set unit.archer.vision=2;
>
> simple_set_statement is intended for
> toplevel attributes:
And that is the point. What makes such attributes toplevel attributes?
Why can't "huts" be under a "map" object? Why can't "ailevel hard" be
under "aicontroll"? Why can't "min_dist_bw_cities" in another category
(event if this is named "misc")? IMHO they are special because of
historical reasons.
> set huts 0;
> set ailevel hard;
> set min_dist_bw_cities = 4;
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a
swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you
can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell
if the paint is giving her a rash."
-- Joshua R. Poulson
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Raimar Falke, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Arien Malec, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Raimar Falke, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Arien Malec, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Raimar Falke, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Arien Malec, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Daniel L Speyer, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Daniel Sjölie, 2001/09/26
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Justin Moore, 2001/09/26
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Daniel Sjölie, 2001/09/26
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs],
Raimar Falke <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Arien Malec, 2001/09/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Reinier Post, 2001/09/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Arien Malec, 2001/09/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Reinier Post, 2001/09/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Raimar Falke, 2001/09/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Reinier Post, 2001/09/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: commandline syntax and semantics (was: Server/ruleset unification), Raimar Falke, 2001/09/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Raimar Falke, 2001/09/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Daniel L Speyer, 2001/09/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Server/ruleset unification [Was [RFC PATCH] init_techs], Reinier Post, 2001/09/27
|
|