Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] more small directional cleanups
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] more small directional cleanups

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Dorje Short <jshort@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] more small directional cleanups
From: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:06:16 -0400

At 05:30 PM 01/08/22 +0200, Raimar Falke wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 10:44:35AM -0400, Ross W. Wetmore wrote:
[...]
>> Corecleanup_06a is a more comprehensive cleanup that apart from the things
>> it inherited from the first dir_patch, tries to do what is needed for the
>> long term with as few intermediate sidetracks as possible. But this sort of
>> comprehensive patch appears not as easily accepted by the maintainers as
your
>> quickie stepwise versions. I haven't had any real feedback or direct
>> acknowledgment of these changes yet, though if the clock started running
>> officially last Sunday, it is not unreasonable for someone to still be
>> trying to digest the full meal. It is also overlayed on your dir_patch and
>> I haven't seen this go in either so there is a potential queuing delay.
>
>I'm sorry Ross. I looked at some of the patches and I also tought I
>sent comments and so I waited for a new version from you. Looking at
>the archive I have only commented on the autogame.

No reason to be sorry ... while I was needling the maintainers a little 
for which I apologize, and which your earlier posting of patch status has
more than made up for, I hope I indicated that it was a little early for
more than a quick eval of something like corecleanup_06a. There is nothing
tricky there once you understand the pattern of the 3 or 4 types of change
but there are a lot of places to check if you are being conscientious.

And when you are done and it is in Freeciv will be a lot more robust :-).

If it helps, you should be able take individual diff blocks for each file
or at least a begin/end pair, and apply them separately. Most of the 
changes are local and obvious. So if you aren't sure about some spots, 
just edit them out to a separate file and resolve them later.

If you send me any such edits I will both tell you if not applying this 
breaks something less obvious, and what the particular sections are 
actually doing. You need the top 3 lines of the diff along with any
complete @@ blocks to make a new mini-diff.

But at a first cut I think you can assume that most of corecleanup_06a
is one-off local bugfixes. It also has had several hours of autogaming
and client autogame testing, i.e. the intermediate fixes were applied
built and separately tested as this patch in addition to having been
around for quite awhile in my final source tree, which is almost
continuosuly under autogame testing (the machine has nothing better to
do when I'm not around :-).

Cheers,
RossW
=====


>> IMHO the best thing to do is discuss the set of changes and make sure that 
>> any gotchas are resolved. This will also help anyone putting it into CVS 
>> as many answers to their questions will already be out there. And if they
>> add questions to the process, they can be resolved as well.
>
>       Raimar
>
>-- 
> email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  A supercomputer is a computer running an endless loop in just a second
>



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]