Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH: new messages again
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH: new messages again

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Thue <thue@xxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH: new messages again
From: Tuomas Airaksinen <tuma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:21:40 +0200
Reply-to: tuomas.airaksinen@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:44:20AM +0100, Thue wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2001 22:16, Tuomas Airaksinen wrote:
> > Argt, famine feared again because you don't apply _ready_
> > patches!!!
> >
> > I think there were consensus that my warning patch were ready
> > (no need for capability string ASO), so why can't you finally
> > apply it!
> >
> > Those warnings are VITAL in every game, I think! Without them there
> > happen many needle mistakes.
> >
> > So... I remind to apply it.
> 
> I took a better look and changed some things:
> -Changed the old famine message from "famine feared" to "famine occured" and 
> changed your new message to "famine feared".
> -Reindented your patch. Either you do it or I have to do it, so please...

Oops. Sorry, it looked just fine with my vim when I edited.

> -Don't report (the new) "famine feared" unless city has negative 
> food_surplus. (this may be controversial, but you generelly have too many 
> cities with 0 food and no surplus)
> -Capitalize the Client Message Options for Consistency
> -Refrase the new government available message
> 
> (If you complain long enough that your patch should just be applied you can 
> expect to have the errors spelled out :))

Heh;)

-- 
Terveisin   Tuomas Airaksinen        linux
Kotisivu:   http://tuma.cjb.net/      is all   
Sähköposti: tuma@xxxxxxxxxxxx          we   
Icq:        11870110, IRCnet: tuma      need 

Attachment: pgpGq9d5anrl5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]