Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: July 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Multiple patches
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Multiple patches

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Freeciv dev list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Multiple patches
From: Robert Rendell <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:28:24 +1000 (EST)

Thue wrote:
} [long discussion on previous patch]
} 
} Here is a gordian knot approch; now wonders being build are list after the
} already build or destroyed wonders, one per line. That also takes care of
} the problem with the previous patch that many cities building a wonder
} would make the lines very long.

Good solution :)

It made me think of another change to make to this display that would be
nice: divide up the wonders into "ancient", "mediaeval" or "modern"
wonders, as the paycivs did.  That could be easily accommodated in the
buildings.ruleset file; the current boolean 'is_wonder' could be changed to
indicate era, as well.

This would be nice because it helps structure the wonders display a bit,
allowing you to more quickly see if a particular wonder you're interested
in is built or being built, and (tending to) lump the obsolete wonders
together in the list.

                                                        Have fun,
                                                         Rob R.
                                                          \((/
                                                          ~oo~
                                                          /))\



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]