Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv and Civ II

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv and Civ II

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: garfy@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Freeciv Developer <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv and Civ II
From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:02:50 +0100

On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 01:42:11PM +0200, Egbert Hinzen wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Tuomas Airaksinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Egbert Hinzen wrote:
> > > AFAIK there was the idea that Freeciv should become compatible to
> > > Civ II... 8-)
> > Why should we make Freeciv COMPATIBLE with civ2? 
> > I suppose our goal is to make freeciv much better than civ2 
> > (and IMO, it is already!).
> That's right. But better means more than as good as...
> ... and I don't think that Freeciv is as good as Civ II...
> or CIV I, BTW.

Interesting you should say that.

Care to elaborate?  Why don't you think it is as good as them?

(Myself, I think it's a close run thing, and if pacts were
implemented, I'd come out in favour of freeciv every time)


Jules Bean                          |        Any sufficiently advanced 
jules@{,}  |  technology is indistinguishable
jmlb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              |               from a perl script

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]