[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New Nations
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jeff Mallatt wrote:
> At 2000/02/29 09:14 , Lalo Martins wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:43:35AM -0800, Steven Burnap wrote:
> >>
> >> When the French showed up in that, they asked a local tribe who the
> >> people up the river were. The tribe responded with something that
> >> the French transliterated into "Sioux". Since the tribes in question
> >> didn't like each other, it was a derogatory word. (Can't remember
> >> which right now.) The people in question prefer to be called "Lakota".
>
> Hum. Looking at <http://www.sioux.org/tribal_history.htm>, it seems
> "Lakota" refers to only one of three divisions of the "Sioux". It also
> seems they use the word "Sioux", themselves. So, let's leave it unless and
> until further evidence crops up.
Lakota, Nakota, Dakota <- this were three parts of this nation. Cheyennes
were their cousins. In Poland in all publications i read that they don't
like ,,sioux'' name.
A.D.Danilecki "szopen"
|
|