Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: yet more new cities
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: yet more new cities

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Jules Bean <jmlb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: yet more new cities
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 19:59:31 +0100

On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 02:39:02PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > 1)
> > Danzig is german name of Gdansk, which is already in Polish cityset.
> > Please don't double it.
> > 
> > 2)
> > Koenigsberg is actual Russian city Kaliningrad.
> > If you want to give it to Germans, make a comment for Russians :
> > 
> > ; Kaliningrad is already allocated as German city Koenigsberg
> > 
> > and for Polish (this was Polish city very long time) :
> > 
> > ; Królewiec is already allocated as German city Koenigsberg
> 
> a) I don't see any reason why two cities that happened to be historically
> the same shouldn't appear twice in a game of freeciv.  Lots of the Roman
> cities are also English cities, but I don't think that matters at all.  In
> some vague alternate universe, they might have given these names to
> different pieces of soil...
> 
> b) I thought there was more than one koenigsberg?  It's a pretty obvious
> name, anyhow..

a)
Roman/English should be resolved, this really mess in one's mind if he
has both Danzig and Gdansk.

b)
There were possibly many Koenigsbergs, but only 1 important one,
and we are talking about this one.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]