Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-ai: August 2004:
[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9624) remove ugliness from ai_cal

[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9624) remove ugliness from ai_cal

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9624) remove ugliness from ai_calc_pollution/fallout
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:28:06 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

Jason Short wrote:
> <URL: >
> Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
>><URL: >
>>On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Jason Short wrote:
>>>But that is already practically guaranteed by the "extra" value passed
>>>to consider_settler_action.  There is surely no need for multiple such
>>>values to be added on.
>>I agree one mechanism is enough.  But "extra" has to be carefully balanced
>>with the main part, and "best_other" is already in the right scale.
> In that case we can probably remove pplayer->ai.warmth.  And we should 
> remove the "extra" field entirely and take all effects into account in 
> the initial calculation.

On further review there is a reason for using the extra field: it does 
not get multiplied by 4 for used tiles.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9624) remove ugliness from ai_calc_pollution/fallout, Jason Short <=