Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-ai: August 2004:
[freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#9063) Bug: AI can't handle notradesize/fulltradesiz

[freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#9063) Bug: AI can't handle notradesize/fulltradesiz

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#9063) Bug: AI can't handle notradesize/fulltradesize
From: "Gregory Berkolaiko" <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:12:35 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Mike Jing wrote:

> <URL: >
> I would suggest that we should remove the notradesize/fulltradesize
> server options altogether, since they do not work as a deterrence to ICS
> as originally intended.   Of course, ideally AI should be able to deal
> with different rulesets and server settings, but I feel that it's a
> waste of valuable maintainer resources to teach AI to deal with useless
> server options.

I feel the same about many option that people try to foster upon freeciv.
But tell me why is it not a deterrent against ICS?


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#9063) Bug: AI can't handle notradesize/fulltradesize, Gregory Berkolaiko <=