Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-ai: January 2003:
[freeciv-ai] Re: Goto coordinates and ai roles

[freeciv-ai] Re: Goto coordinates and ai roles

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Freeciv AI development <freeciv-ai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [freeciv-ai] Re: Goto coordinates and ai roles
From: "Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:27:25 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> I read the whole thread (or at least the portion of it that was in my
> mailbox) and I still remember that you proposed the bool and this
> proposition was subsequently ignored. My email was a humble call to
> reevaluate your earlier proposal ;)
> Anyway, unless there are plans to point that pointer to somewhere else in
> the future, bool is both enough to make it work and easier to understand.

I still think that my proposal is the best one (duh), so I'll repeat it:

Know from the context of ai_role when a unit must or must not have a valid

I like the idea of punit->goto_dest->x anyway, since this ensures that the
server goes down in a spectacular crash when something goes wrong.

  - Per

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]