[aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism...
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thursday 25 April 2002 05:03 pm, you wrote:
> scientists measure the age of the Universe. Faults such as, "carbon-dating
> is not accurate" (that's right... it's not accurate for more than 5,000
> years or so. We don't need something accurate to the time-of-death to
> realize a fossil is millions of years old).
Just to set the record straight, carbon-14 dating is a pretty good out to to
50,000 years. Carbon-14 has a half-life of about 5300 years. In one
"calibration" a few years ago, scientists counted 43,000 annual layers layed
down in Lake Suigetsu in Japan and compared carbon-14 datings with the count
of layers. Carbon-14 dating came out pretty good.
Argon-argon dating uses the half-life of argon-40 which is 1.25 billion years
to establish dates of from 2000 years ago to millions of years ago.
bruce
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Tom Hull, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Burt Humburg, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Jonathan Hall, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Glenn Wiens, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Denis Medvedev, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Burt Humburg, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Jonathan Hall, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism and Epistemology, Glenn Wiens, 2002/04/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Michael Bainum, 2002/04/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Burt Humburg, 2002/04/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism...,
bbales <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Tom Hull, 2002/04/25
- [aclug-L] Re: Linux and Creationism..., Jonathan Hall, 2002/04/25
|
|