Re: Same Remote Server, Different Folders, Different Delays

["Per B. Sederberg" <psederberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Everybody:

I found this message from a year ago and I would like to have the same
syncing policy with gmail, but it doesn't seem to work.

I have very few messages in my INBOX and would like to access it
quickly and frequently, whereas I have over 35K messages in All Mail,
which takes up a chunk of bandwidth and processor cycles to update in
OfflineIMAP whenever there's a new message.

I tried setting up two accounts (one with just my inbox, the one with
all mail, each set with different autorefresh values) in my
.offlineimaprc, but since they point to the same local folder, which
is I think not allowed in OfflineIMAP, it doesn't seem to work, only
syncing up the one I list first.

Does anyone know of a possible solution?  I can provide more
information if necessary.

Thanks,
Per

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Paul Hinze <paul.t.hinze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote=
:
> Hi All,
>
> First I've got to say I love offlineimap. =A0It lets me have all the
> benefits of mutt with local Maildirs while at the same time mirroring
> all local activity on my GMail account. =A0Brilliant.
>
> Now, I've started working in an environment where my email response time
> is more important, and I'm looking at ways to reduce the amount of time
> between mail checks while still being efficient. =A0What I'd like to do i=
s
> check INBOX more often than I check the Sent Mail or All Mail folders on
> GMail. =A0I would do this with a couple of different remote connection
> definitions with different folderfilter and delay attributes.
>
> I just wanted to throw that idea out to the list and make sure that I
> wouldn't be breaking something crucial by doing that. =A0Not sure if
> multiple remote connection definitions to the same server is a use case
> that has been considered yet.
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>