Re: OfflineIMAP & UW IMAPd

[S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <arifsaha@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, John Goerzen wrote:
> That question rests entirely in the UW IMAPd camp; if they 
> preserve UIDs now, then OfflineIMAP will work better with it 
> now.

Thanks, no need to adversarial, though. :-) I am not looking for 
blame, just simply ask for recent experiences, if any.

> Yes, exactly.  That eliminates any guesswork as to which 
> messages corresponds with which.

Do offlineimap - upon determination that the UID is persistence 
and there is an existing UID mapping - will solely use UID to 
determine correlation of same e-mail in 2 repository? So there 
won't be additional checking of the content of the e-mail to 
assure those 2 actually the same e-mail?

-- 
    ____  ____  ____  ____ (stephan paul) Arif Sahari Wibowo
   /___  /___/ /___/ /___      http://www.arifsaha.com/
  ____/ /     /   / ____/