Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: offlineimap: August 2009:
Re: OfflineIMAP & UW IMAPd

Re: OfflineIMAP & UW IMAPd

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, offlineimap@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OfflineIMAP & UW IMAPd
From: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <arifsaha@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:07:22 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-to: offlineimap@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, John Goerzen wrote:
> That question rests entirely in the UW IMAPd camp; if they 
> preserve UIDs now, then OfflineIMAP will work better with it 
> now.

Thanks, no need to adversarial, though. :-) I am not looking for 
blame, just simply ask for recent experiences, if any.

> Yes, exactly.  That eliminates any guesswork as to which 
> messages corresponds with which.

Do offlineimap - upon determination that the UID is persistence 
and there is an existing UID mapping - will solely use UID to 
determine correlation of same e-mail in 2 repository? So there 
won't be additional checking of the content of the e-mail to 
assure those 2 actually the same e-mail?

    ____  ____  ____  ____ (stephan paul) Arif Sahari Wibowo
   /___  /___/ /___/ /___
  ____/ /     /   / ____/

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]