Re: LocalStatus as SQLlite

[John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun March 30 2008 8:55:37 pm stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> About a year ago I sent to the list a patch that switched LocalStatus
> from the flat files to an SQLLite database which for me, improved
> speed and memory usage (the latter being the most dramatic).
>
> A year later, I'm still using and maintaining my patches.
>
> So here's the latest. Nothing much changed from the last patches,
> but they are updated to the latest git tree.
>
> I've also pushed to http://saturn.flamingspork.com/~stewart/offlineimap
> the branch sqlite_localstatus

Hi Stewart,

First off, thank you for your continued work and persistence on this.

Referring back to the original thread [1], it looks like there may be a 
couple of regressions:

1) That we cannot use threading to simultaneously download multiple messages 
in a single folder;

2) That changes are not committed immediately after each change (but only at 
the end of processing a folder)

Do you know if these regressions are still present in your patch?

[1] 
http://lists.complete.org/offlineimap@xxxxxxxxxxxx/2007/03/msg00009.html.gz