Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: offlineimap: August 2007:
Re: use of UIDs vs. MSGID
Home

Re: use of UIDs vs. MSGID

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: offlineimap@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: use of UIDs vs. MSGID
From: martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:59:15 +0200

also sprach John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007.08.14.1632 +0200]:
> Because it is not guaranteed that there will be exactly one copy
> with a given message-id header in any given mailbox.  Think about
> scenarios where a user copies a message from folder A to folder B,
> and then copies the same message from folder B to folder A.
> Folder A will now have two copies of the message, but each one
> could have its own flags.  Also, some mailboxes contain messages
> without that header (common examples are Drafts folders).  
Doh! Thanks for the explanation.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
 
why do they sterilise the needle for lethal injections?
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: digital_signature_gpg.asc
-- Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGwcNDIgvIgzMMSnURAnAcAJ9RIMu/IKyNsp1XrwLD5/O4y+rr3ACeO1sh
qpbRDlS+iysWs1kNSIRL1+Y=
=VRzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]