use of UIDs vs. MSGID
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
OfflineIMAP uses the X-OfflineIMAP-x... header to identify messages,
and the IMAP server's UID notion to link them to the server copy.
Since we're dealing with mail all along, and mail messages have
a unique message-id header, I wonder why that's not being used. It's
likely to be indexed on the server and could thus increase the speed
of searches.
Also, why does OfflineIMAP store headers like
X-OfflineIMAP-x825313192-7365616d75732e6d61646475636b2e6e6574-494e424f58:
1186324387-0249694837446-v5.99.0
?
As in, why is the header label not constant? And what do all these
numbers mean?
Cheers,
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
"man kann die menschen nur von ihren eigenen meinungen überzeugen."
-- charles tschopp
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: digital_signature_gpg.asc
-- Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGwbgFIgvIgzMMSnURAmd3AKDopPnJdhoGdtHY6qfYdAmdQhFd1wCfeMOB
I4RzuIUOdHw2eXt8fPpdKrc=
=l4pV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- use of UIDs vs. MSGID,
martin f krafft <=
|
|