Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:50:18AM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Great, thanks a lot!
>
> > I think the rest of our points are probably correct. Alas, I haven't
That should have read "YOUR points"...
> > had a lot of time to work on OfflineIMAP lately and might not have a lot
> > of time to look into it shortly.
>
> OK. If you managed just to find time to verify my suspicions, I might
> be able to find a few minutes to make the code more robust...
Yes, I do believe you are correct. I haven't tested it to make sure,
but this could account for some of the odd things people have reported
sometimes.
-- John
- [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader, Adam Spiers, 2006/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader, John Goerzen, 2006/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader, Adam Spiers, 2006/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader - take 2, Adam Spiers, 2006/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader - take 2, John Goerzen, 2006/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader - take 2, Adam Spiers, 2006/05/16
- Re: [PATCH] improve savemessage_searchforheader - take 2, John Goerzen, 2006/05/16
|
|