Re: Status update

[John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:56:52PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:   [Fri Jun 04 2004, 11:11:07PM EDT]
> > Sure.  Bear in mind as you notice the length of this message that you
> > asked for it :-)
> 
> Wow!  Thanks for taking the time to write such a complete explanation.
> Personally I agree that staying with threads instead of switching to
> Twisted is the better route at this point.  My reason would simply be
> the apparent lack of bugs in your current implementation.  Switching
> would undoubtedly introduce new bugs that would then need to be

Yup, I agree.

> > disk and installer modeled after Gentoo's.)
> 
> Thanks, I'll take a look.  Though I have to admit the only place I run
> Debian at the moment is ia64.

No problem :-)  

> Certainly.  So far there hasn't been a peep about offlineimap,
> certainly a testimony to the quality of your code, since I'm sure that
> people are using it on Gentoo.

That's good to know :-)

> Well, Gentoo just has a different philosophy on architecture support.

[ snip ]

Gotcha.  Thanks for the explanation.

-- John